I haven't taken the time to try to understand your Christology, but I have a comment about the name issue. "Pawline Christology" may seem "unseemly" to you, perhaps because it feels prideful to name an idea after yourself. But "the Conciliar Narrow-Scope Negation Model" is a real mouthful! As a charity to your colleagues, consider accepting Pawline Christology...
I'm most interested in the Patience book, knowing it is a virtue lacking in me. Interesting read, I appreciated learning about all your recent scholarship. Carry on!
Ha! It sure is a mouthful. How about this. You guys can call it Pawline, and I'll stick to the mouthful name. Deal?
And thanks for the kind words. I've got a bunch more scholarship, as well as an image of a cat that knows (however cats know) it shouldn't be on that table, here: https://sites.google.com/view/timpawl/research
On the CV, I would think it would go in the "book chapters" section, that seems closest to what it is imv, a bit beefier one
Why "Pawline Christology"? Why not "Timid Christology"? That way, it's less of a mouthful, but you're clearly not putting on airs?
What, you're too fancy to go by "Tim" nowadays?
Jerk.
In our magnificence, we no longer answer to single-syllable terms, like "Tim." Or "Jerk."
Or "Dad."
I haven't taken the time to try to understand your Christology, but I have a comment about the name issue. "Pawline Christology" may seem "unseemly" to you, perhaps because it feels prideful to name an idea after yourself. But "the Conciliar Narrow-Scope Negation Model" is a real mouthful! As a charity to your colleagues, consider accepting Pawline Christology...
I'm most interested in the Patience book, knowing it is a virtue lacking in me. Interesting read, I appreciated learning about all your recent scholarship. Carry on!
Ha! It sure is a mouthful. How about this. You guys can call it Pawline, and I'll stick to the mouthful name. Deal?
And thanks for the kind words. I've got a bunch more scholarship, as well as an image of a cat that knows (however cats know) it shouldn't be on that table, here: https://sites.google.com/view/timpawl/research